This is a more general simplified look at the controllers of 95% the media that we watch today. Below is the depths on a more specific break down:
Hypothetically, if the media does control the masses what all does this mean? Well for instance say the CEO of Viacom, in the past and present is a major donor to the Clinton campaign. For argument sake lets say that he has had talks discussing a diplomatic approach to allowing a new MTV network release in a country that it wasn’t allowed to or didn’t have the proper connections before but could if she became president. This could skew the coverage of more important issues like the Benghazi attacks, or the email scandal. Even deeper like issues that may even relate her to negativity like President Obama’s health care. This situation is hypothetical to an extent but not completely by the way.